Legal Opinion
State v. Joseph
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2006No. 27001PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold in this appeal by Plaintiff-Appellant State of Hawai'i (the prosecution) that (1) the statement obtained from DefendanL-Appellee Rodney Joseph, Jr. (Joseph) was obtained in violation of Joseph’s right to remain silent, and (2) the statement made after Joseph had been given his Miranda rights and any evidence resulting from such statements are inadmissible as the fruit of the first statement. Therefore, the November 4, 2004 Order Granting [Joseph’s] Motion to *484Suppress Statement and Evidence (the order) issued by the circuit court of the first circuit1…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. EliHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. CelesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- State v. MarianoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.