Commonwealth v. Simon
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
In this interlocutory appeal, we determine that the presence of counsel during police questioning of a suspect, when the suspect has had an opportunity to consult with counsel beforehand, substitutes adequately for the giving of Miranda warnings, see Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966) {Miranda). We affirm the Superior Court judge’s decision denying the defendant’s motion to suppress statements he made during such questioning. In addition, since most of the statements made by the victim during an emergency call to a 911 dispatcher were made to obtain urgent medical attention and,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClarkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. TremblayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HoytMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Linton v. SabaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.