Legal Opinion

State v. Eli

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 2012No. SCAP-30420PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold in this case that after arrest the police practice of inviting an arrestee to make a statement and to give his or her “side of the story” or similar entreaties in a “pre-interview” before Miranda warnings are given, violates the defendant’s right against self-incrimination, article I, section 10,1 and right to due process, article I, section 52 of the Hawai’i Constitution. Further, we hold that under the circumstances of this case the Mirandized statement offered into evidence at trial resulted from the exploitation of the said pre-interview practice.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. KauliaHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. Brian I. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. Kazanas.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API