Legal Opinion

State v. Yong Shik Won

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2015No. SCWC-12-0000858PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

POLLACK, J.

Under our law, a person has a statutory and constitutional right to refuse to consent to a bodily search unless an exception to the search warrant requirement is present. In this ease, the defendant was informed by the police of his right to refuse to consent to a search, but he was also told that if he exercised that right, his refusal to consent would be a crime for which he could be imprisoned for up to thirty days.

Yong Shik Won was stopped by police while driving his vehicle on April 20, 2011. After his arrest for operating his vehicle under the influence…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State v. Shannon Rajda / State v. Albert Lee Lape, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. State v. Wade F. LilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. State v. Ui.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API