Legal Opinion

Terteling v. United States.

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 17, 1964No. 374-60PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

334 F.2d 250

N. L. and J. L. TERTELING, Co-Partners doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of J. A. Terteling & Sons, and Successors in Interest to J. W. and N. L. Terteling, Co-Partners doing business under the Firm Name and Style of J. A. Terteling & Sons

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 374-60.

United States Court of Claims.

July 17, 1964.

Paul McNulty, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs. John W. Gaskins, John A. McWhorter, and King & King, Washington, D. C., on the briefs.

Irving Jaffe, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, for defendant. Edna P. Goldberg, Washington,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Terteling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Manufacturers Aircraft Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  4. Electric Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Reynolds Metals Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Mazama Timber Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Reynolds Metals Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API