Legal Opinion
Reynolds Metals Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 19, 1971No. 321-68PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVIS, Judge.
Reynolds Metals invokes for this claim the blue-blooded parentage of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States, 388 F.2d 317, 181 Ct.Cl. 902 (1967), 409 F.2d 238, 187 Ct.Cl. 443 (1969), but the child turns out to be a changeling rather than a true heir. The facts are the same (we can assume) but Reynolds, unlike Kaiser, waited beyond the magic period of six years.
During the Korean emergency the Government undertook to secure expansion of primary aluminum manufacturing facilities in order to increase the supply of that commodity to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- South Louisiana Grain Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Aluminum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Greenbrier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.