Legal Opinion

Department of Natural Resources & Conservation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 14, 1983No. 46-80CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In this action, plaintiff seeks reimbursement from the United States of amounts it had to pay a third party, arising out of a contract between plaintiff and the third party, as a result of a State court judgment. Plaintiff contends that, since this adverse judgment resulted solely from the government’s breach of its obligations under a contract between plaintiff and the government, a provision in this contract, purporting to limit the government’s liability under the contract to only 50 percent of any such payment, is inapplicable.

I

This case arises out of a “Project…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Saunooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Ables v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API