Legal Opinion

Phillips v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 16, 1988No. 19833-5-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Coleman, A.C.J.

Bryce Phillips appeals from the jury verdict and judgment entered thereon dismissing his wrongful discharge claim against the City of Seattle. We affirm.

In July 1979, Bryce Phillips began working as a plumber for the City. His absentee record apparently was no cause of concern until late 1982 when Phillips began using unusual amounts of sick leave. His immediate supervisor, Phil Hyde, spoke with Phillips in February 1983 about the absences and referred him to the Employees' Assistance Program (EAP) for counseling.

Phillips testified that he told Hyde that he was an alcoholic.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Clinton C. Simpson v. Reynolds Metals Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. Dean v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Washington Public Employees Ass'n v. Washington Personnel Resources BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Birch Bay Trailer Sales, Inc. v. Whatcom CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. City of Seattle v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API