Legal Opinion

Reese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1987No. 52153-1, 51151-9PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Julius and Betty Reese and William Beauchamp appeal summary judgment dismissals of their employment discrimination claims. Their appeals have been consolidated because they raise an identical question of law: whether the exclusive remedy provision of the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), RCW 51.04.010, bars employee actions against their employers for disability discrimination under the Law Against Discrimination, RCW 49.60. Reese and Beauchamp argue that the two acts in question have significantly different purposes and seek to remedy different types of injuries. They contend that an IIA claim…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Weyer v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API