Legal Opinion

Morango v. Phillips

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949No. 30791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was brought by George Morango against Richard Phillips, J. H. Powell, and R. E. Farrell, and their respective wives, individually and as copartners doing business under the name of Phillips & Powell, to recover damages arising out of an alleged breach of a written contract to complete the remodelling of a dwelling house. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered a judgment awarding the plaintiff a money recovery. The defendants have appealed from the judgment.

The theory upon which the respondent proceeded at the trial was that on December 6, 1946, he made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crowley v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Mapes v. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Eggers v. LusterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hopper v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Russell v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Yount v. Indianola Beach Estates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API