Legal Opinion

Yount v. Indianola Beach Estates, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1964No. 36703PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

There are times when an attempt by the courts to rescind a contract is like trying to unring a bell. What’s done is done and cannot be undone. A problem in rescission faced the learned trial judge here.

Plaintiff Yount, an experienced trader in real-estate equities, along with one Dale Brady, had been buying and selling real-estate interests and participating in highly complicated real-estate deals since 1955. He understood the complexi ties of these trades and had grown accustomed to the use of complicated real-estate paper.

On July 25, 1960, plaintiff Yount and his coplaintiff Kireigel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hesselgrave v. MottWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Morango v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Phillips v. BlaserWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Burton v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. In re the Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Vacova Company v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API