Yount v. Indianola Beach Estates, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
There are times when an attempt by the courts to rescind a contract is like trying to unring a bell. What’s done is done and cannot be undone. A problem in rescission faced the learned trial judge here.
Plaintiff Yount, an experienced trader in real-estate equities, along with one Dale Brady, had been buying and selling real-estate interests and participating in highly complicated real-estate deals since 1955. He understood the complexi ties of these trades and had grown accustomed to the use of complicated real-estate paper.
On July 25, 1960, plaintiff Yount and his coplaintiff Kireigel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Hesselgrave v. MottWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Morango v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Phillips v. BlaserWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Burton v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- In re the Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Vacova Company v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.