Legal Opinion
Littman v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1934No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
The plaintiff, Joseph Littman, owned a two-story brick flat-roofed building in Clearfield. The first floor was used for stores and the second floor for living apartments and offices. The offices and apartments had telephone service. The roof of the building had a skylight. The plaintiff claimed that at noon on October 29, 1930, he went on the roof of this building to examine possible leaks and that as he walked over to the skylight he tripped and fell on his right side and injured his right elbow and right shoulder. He said he “was knocked out by the fall” and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Herb v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Maher v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Paul v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.