Paciulan v. George
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:
ILLSTON, District Judge.(1)GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND;(2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
AND(3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS BY IMPOSING A PREFILING REQUIREMENT
On July 24 and September 4, 1998, the Court heard argument on defendants’ motions to dismiss and for sanctions, and plaintiffs’ counter motion for summary judgment. 1 Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the submitted papers, the Court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint without leave to amend; DENIES plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Paciulan v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. BerchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. SimandleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. BerchDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.