Legal Opinion
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Simandle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 14, 2016No. 15-3356UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
By its own description, the National Association for the Advancement of Multiju-risdiction Practice (“NAAMJP”) advocates “throughout the United States for the purpose of improving the legal profession, by petitioning for admission on motion in the dwindling minority of jurisdictions that have not yet adopted ... reciprocal admission for all lawyers.” (JA164.) In other words, the NAAMJP endeavors to reduce the barriers to entry to legal practice in the various state and federal courts across the country. Its view, which should tug at the heartstrings of any…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Evancho v. Pine-Richland School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nat'l Assoc. for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Beryl A HowellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bank v. WolfeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Kurtz v. Lewisburg School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.