Legal Opinion
Walczak v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBokdov, J.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants, and from the judgment rendered thereon the plaintiff has appealed. Although there are four assignments of error, only two are pursued. The plaintiff claims error in the court’s failure to charge the jury adequately on defective brakes and its refusal to allow the plaintiff the right to exercise a peremptory challenge on a juror already accepted but not yet sworn.
The complaint, among ten specifications of negligence, alleges that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. TaborskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Maggi v. MendilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wright v. HuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. DanielsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.