Legal Opinion
Borsoi v. Sparico
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 16, 1954PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as a result of the negligence of the defendant Alfred Giordano, agent of the defendant Raymond Sparico. The defendants offered no evidence and moved for a directed verdict on the ground of the claimed insufficiency of the plaintiff’s evidence. The motion was denied, and the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants moved the court for judgment notwithstanding the verdict upon the grounds that the verdict was contrary to the law, contrary to the evidence and could…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Amato v. DesentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Swentusky v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Botticelli v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.