Legal Opinion
State v. McIntosh
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 1986No. 11882PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
After a jury trial the defendant, Larry McIntosh, was found guilty of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a and committed to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a term of forty years. The indictment charged that he had caused the death of Kim Rascoe by blows to the head with a hammer. On appeal, the defendant contends that the *156trial court erred in refusing his request for instructions on certain lesser included offenses and in admitting hearsay testimony.
It is undisputed that the defendant killed Kim Rascoe. Rascoe, with whom the defendant had broken off relations,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. VilalastraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.