Busick v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Sacramento County. P. J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. O. G. Hopkins, A. L. Shinn, and Charles G. Busick, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is a petition for a writ of prohibition. In reply to the order to show cause, respondent filed a demurrer upon the ground “that the petition does not state facts sufficient to authorize the issuance of the writ prayed for,” and thus is presented the question for determination. It appears that on the sixteenth day of November, 1910, the board of supervisors of the county of Sacramento, after duly canvassing the returns of the general election held on the eighth day of November, 1910, by resolution duly passed, declared the result thereof, and on said sixteenth day of November, 1910, by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hadley v. GutridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- O'Dowd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. Van ZandtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Hagerty v. ConlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Hill v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Curry v. McCafferyMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Marsh v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Stephens v. NaceyMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Dennis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.