Hill v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of mandate to the Superior Court of Sacramento County. P. J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The undisputed facts are these: At the general election held on the eighth day of November, 1910, petitioner and one R. A. Merkeley were opposing candidates for the office of constable of Riverside township in the county of Sacramento; on the sixteenth day of November, the board of supervisors of said county, after having canvassed the returns, by resolution duly passed and entered on its minutes, declared said Merkeley elected to said office; on the fifth day of December following the petitioner filed in the office of the county clerk of said county a written statement of his contest of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Temple v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Heinlen v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lindsay Strathmore Irrigation District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Busick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911