Hagerty v. Conlan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San. Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an appeal, upon a hill of exceptions, from a judgment of dismissal.
Charles T. Conlan, the respondent herein, was on the twenty-second day of November, 1909, declared to have been elected judge of the police court of the city and county of San Francisco.
On the first day of December, 1909, the appellant, an elector of said city and county, instituted proceedings in the superior court, under the provisions of part III, title II of the Code of Civil Procedure, contesting the right of respondent to the office.
The court thereupon designated the third day of January, 1910, as the time for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Dowd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kellett v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- California Academy of Sciences v. FletcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Thomas v. Van ZandtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Dudley v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curry v. McCafferyMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Benson v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Busick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Stephens v. NaceyMontana Supreme Court · 1913