Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Engleman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1885No. 12,184PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Erom the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first and second paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint count upon promissory notes executed by the appellee, the third is upon an account for goods sold and delivered to her. The answer of the latter is, in substance, as follows: That she was a married woman at the time the notes were executed and the goods purchased; that she still is a married woman, and that the notes were not given by her in consideration of her separate property, nor for any improvements or benefits to her real or personal property, nor were they given by her in any business, loan or trade carried on by her, nor by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wulschner v. SellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Rothschild v. RaabIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ward v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Haynes v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lane v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McLead v. Ætna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API