Rothschild v. Raab

— In this case the appellee’s demurrer to the appellant’s complaint, for the alleged insufficiency of the facts therein to constitute a cause of action, was sustained by the court. The appellant failing to amend his complaint, judgment was rendered against him for the appellee’s costs.

The ruling upon the demurrer to his complaint is the only error assigned here by the appellant, and it presents for our decision the single question of the sufficiency of his cause of action.

The complaint counted upon a promissory note, executed by the appellee to the order of C. L. Hill and endorsed by him to…