Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Nowlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1891No. 15,400PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The question which the record presents

arises upon the ruling of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the appellant’s complaint. The question which requires our consideration and judgment is this: Can a married woman maintain an action against one who wrongfully entices her husband from her and alienates his affections ?

It was- the boast of the common law that “ there is no *582right without a remedy,” and, in the main, this boast was not an idle one, but was made good by the vindication of legal rights in almost all instances where the right was appropriately presented for judicial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  3. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Logan v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Brown v. KistlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. King v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hamilton v. McNeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API