Legal Opinion

Hebrink v. Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 2003No. C9-02-2189PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s sua sponte grant of summary judgment in favor of respondent. Appellant argues that the district court erred in (1) granting summary judgment on respondent’s disguised and improperly noticed motion for summary judgment; (2) holding that the policy definition of “physicians” was unambiguous; and (3) barring evidence that the agent negligently assisted appellant in completing the disability insurance application. Because respondent’s motion in li-mine, requesting that the court bar evidence regarding appellant’s treatment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  3. Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wendland & Utz, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Wendland & Utz, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API