Legal Opinion
Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Wendland & Utz, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2003No. 02-2554PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Wendland & Utz seeks reversal of a summary judgment entered in favor of its insurer, Employers Mutual Casualty Company (“EMC”). An attorney at the law firm of Wendland & Utz, while driving his own vehicle to pick up a witness, struck and seriously injured a pedestrian, Dr. Wen-Po Daniel Su (“Dr. Su”). 1 EMC denied coverage because the policy it issued to Wendland & Utz does not provide coverage for automobile accidents, even those occurring during the scope of employment. EMC sought a declaratory judgment that no coverage exists under the policy. In response, Wendland &…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Wendland & Utz, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003