Legal Opinion

State v. Bunn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1973No. 36PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Defendant’s defense to the charges of murder and felonious assault of which he was convicted is that at the time he shot both Mrs. Smith and Tommie Stevens he was so drunk he was utterly incapable of forming a deliberate and premeditated purpose to kill or to form any criminal intent whatever; and that he did not know the nature and quality of his acts and the difference between right and wrong in relation to them.

It is settled law “that voluntary drunkenness is not a legal excuse for crime.” State v. Propst, 274 N.C. 62, 71, 161 S.E. 2d 560, 567 (1968). See State v. Potts, 100…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. People v. LangworthyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API