State v. Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendant asserts, inter alia, that he is entitled to a new trial because (1) the judge erred in his charge with reference to the quantum of proof required of defendant in order to reduce murder in the second degree to manslaughter or to establish the defense of self-defense and (2) the judge failed to submit to the jury the issue of defendant’s guilt of involuntary manslaughter.
The judge explained to the jury that if defendant intentionally shot Sawyer with a pistol and thereby caused his death, the law presumed that the killing was unlawful and done with malice and, nothing else appearing,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. ClokeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.