People v. Langworthy
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, C.J.
The common ground of these cases is that, at their trials, both defendants attempted to utilize voluntary intoxication as a defense to charges of crimes which Michigan appellate courts previously have held to be general-intent crimes. Both defendants request this Court to expand the category of specific-intent crimes to include the offenses they were convicted of, i.e., first-degree criminal sexual conduct and second-degree murder, in order to make available to them the defense of voluntary intoxication.
Facts
Defendant Lundy was found guilty but mentally ill of three counts of first-degree…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Commonwealth v. GravesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SabinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GoeckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.