Legal Opinion

People v. Langworthy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1982No. Docket Nos. 65320, 65480. (Calendar Nos. 4, 5)PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, C.J.

The common ground of these cases is that, at their trials, both defendants attempted to utilize voluntary intoxication as a defense to charges of crimes which Michigan appellate courts previously have held to be general-intent crimes. Both defendants request this Court to expand the category of specific-intent crimes to include the offenses they were convicted of, i.e., first-degree criminal sexual conduct and second-degree murder, in order to make available to them the defense of voluntary intoxication.

Facts

Defendant Lundy was found guilty but mentally ill of three counts of first-degree…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. GravesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. SabinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. GoeckeMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API