Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Farmers National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint contains two causes of action in defamation, the first that “ the defendant by its agents, servants or employees stated and published before the police authorities in Hudson, New York and the District Attorney in Hudson, New York and the grand jury in Hudson, New York accusations accusing the plaintiff herein of the crime of grand larceny, first degree,” and the second that “ the defendant, by its agents, servants or employees in the presence and hearing of the police authorities, of the City of Hudson, the District Attorney’s Office and of the City of Hudson and the grand jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Didier v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Union Trust Co. v. Main & South Streets Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Cooke v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nomako v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. Roth v. Atex Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Karash v. KolatchNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API