Legal Opinion
Cooke v. Dodge
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLapham, J.
The amended complaint in this action is challenged by a motion to dismiss under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The plaintiff is the acting principal of the Hornell High School and the Junior High School in the city of Hornell. The defendant Dodge is the superintendent of schools in the city of Hornell and the other three defendants are members of the board of education in that city.
The original complaint, in this action alleged that the defendants conspired to injure the plaintiff in his reputation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Locke v. Benton & Bowles, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Brown v. Paramount Publix Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Farmers National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Roland v. SlesingerNew York Supreme Court · 1959