Legal Opinion

Roth v. Atex Products, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittohi, J.

Motion by the defendants, Atex Products, Inc., Bobert F. Sohne and Gerald C. Sohne, individually and doing business as G. C. S. Electronics Co.: (1) to dismiss the “ First ” cause of action pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, or in the alternative, to separately state and number the causes of action contained therein, pursuant to rule 90 of the Buies of Civil Practice, and (2) to dismiss pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106, or to separately state and number pursuant to rule 90 of the Buies of Civil Practice, the “ Second,” “ Third,” “ Eighth,” “ Ninth,” “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Fisher v. New Yorker Staats-ZeitungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Ginsberg v. Farmers National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seltzer v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. De Meo v. Community Newspapers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API