Legal Opinion
Kalmanash v. Smith
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 1943PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
In this derivative action the plaintiff sues in behalf of himself, and others similarly situated, as a stockholder of the defendant Certain-teed Products Corporation, to which reference will be made as “ Certain-teed.”
It is alleged that plaintiff is the owner and holder of one hundred of the common shares of Certain-teed, the outstanding stock of which comprises 625,340 shares of common and 73,069 shares of preferred stock. The defendants include individuals who are presently, or were formerly, officers or directors of Certain-teed; an individual, Rahr, to whom an “ honorarium ” is alleged to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Leslie v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council of Westchester CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Potter v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- De Luca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Goldstein v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- MATTER OF ZORACH v. ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Clark v. FiggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.