Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Lee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-4624PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Albert Lee appeals from his convictions on four counts of narcotics-related offenses. Lee contends that the district court improperly admitted evidence from two machines used to detect trace amounts of cocaine on Lee’s personal effects. These machines, the Senior and Ionscan, incorporate the scientific techniques of gas chromatographic chemiluminescence and ion mobility spectrometry, respectively, to detect and isolate the location of minute quantities of illegal drugs. Lee argued that these machines and techniques were too experimental to provide admissible evidence.

After the district court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Charles GatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. MajorsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Carmichael v. Samyang Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Carmichael v. Samyang Tires, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1996
  5. Sorensen v. Shaklee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API