Legal Opinion
Carmichael v. Samyang Tires, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided April 1, 1996No. Civil 93-0860-CB-SPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUTLER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by all defendants (tab 117); motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Rumho U.S.A., Inc. (“Kumho U.S.A.”) and Hercules Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. (“Hercules”) (tab 115); and motion of all defendants to exclude testimony of plaintiffs expert Dennis Carlson (tab 119). After careful consideration of the issues raised by the parties in their briefs, the Court finds that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED.
I. Factual Background
The underlying facts of this products…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Oddi v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Carmichael v. Samyang Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Tassin v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.