Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2000No. 99-1143PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to explore the gatekeeper function of the district court in determining the admissibility of expert witnesses under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). Appellant Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (hereinafter “Railroad”) argues that the district court erred in admitting the testimony of Dr. Daniel T. Teitelbaum, which purported to establish a causal link between Appellee Richard Goe-bel’s cognitive brain damage and exposure to diesel exhaust at high altitude. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Nourain B. Niam, and Peter Blagoev, Iordanka Kissiova, and Iana Kissiova v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API