Tompkins v. Tompkins
New Jersey Court of Chancery
This cause was considered upon the pleadings and proofs handed to the court, without'argument or brief from counsel for either party.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The bill is filed to foreclose two mortgages held by the complainant, both of which upon their face were then forfeited by the non-payment of interest, although the principal had not become due upon either. The defendant, in his answer, sets up a parol agreement entered into by the complainant, that if the defendant would lease the premises- to M. and E. Stewart, by a lease binding them to repair the premises, and pay the interest on the mortgages, and the insurance on the building from October, 1867, until April, *3391878, the term of the loase, lie would delay enforcing…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lettieri v. MistrettaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Wujciak v. WujciakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Kruger v. MarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Williams v. SanacoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Amster v. TenneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.