Legal Opinion

Kruger v. Mark

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 19, 1944No. Docket 142/122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the foreclosure of a mortgage given by the defendants to the Crosstown Building and Loan Association. The mortgage was payable in monthly installments of $402 to be applied first to interest; second, to taxes, fire insurance premiums and other liens which might be charged against the premises and paid by the Association; and lastly, to be applied to the principal debt. In September, 1937, and thereafter, the defendants paid, and the Association accepted, in place of the stipulated installments of $402, whatever were the net rents of the property. For instance, in September, $310;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  2. Grigg v. LandisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
  3. Burack v. MayersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  4. Burack v. MayersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  5. Tompkins v. TompkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. William SylkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Williams v. SanacoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Amster v. TenneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Hudson City Savings Bank v. BrockhurstNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API