Legal Opinion

Amster v. Tenney

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 14, 1947No. Docket 147/208, Docket 147/213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This conflict is between the two complainants, Yaskell and Amster, each of whom demands from Dr. Tenney, the defendant, a conveyance of certain land in East Orange. Mr. Yaskell was the tenant of Dr. Tenney under a lease which, in the event Dr. Tenney should receive a satisfactory offer for the purchase of the premises, gave Yaskell "the right for a period of five days after written notice to him, to purchase the said premises upon the same terms and at the same price."

On December 12th, 1945, Dr. Tenney agreed to sell the property to Mr. Amster for $30,000, provided Yaskell did not elect to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haughwout & Pomeroy v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1871
  2. McVoy v. BaumannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  4. King v. RuckmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
  5. Miller v. HeadleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Paparone Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Oxley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Oxley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API