Lettieri v. Mistretta
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
A motion to strike answer, under the present practice, is equivalent to exceptions under the old practice.
The complainants filed a bill to foreclose a mortgage made on August 29th, 1925, by defendants to Joseph Carfora, one of the complainants, to secure payment of $2,550. The mortgage (together with the bond accompanying same) is, by its terms, payable on September 1st, 1928. Interest is payable thereon at the rate of six per cent. per annum, quarter-annually from September 1st, 1925. Both the bond and mortgage contain a provision that should any installment of interest remain unpaid for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Groot v. McCotterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868
- Derechinsky v. EpsteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Derechinsky v. EpsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- South Camden Trust Co. v. StiefelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Tompkins v. TompkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ciavarelli v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Balmoral Arms v. RUTKINNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Sulken v. United Holding Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Har-Rich Realty Corporation v. American Consumer Industries, Inc. And Charles E. Pledger, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.