Wujciak v. Wujciak
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
To this bill of partition, the defendants have answered that they and the complainants orally agreed with each other not to bring any suit for the partition of the land before August 23d 1948, when a certain mortgage will mature. The complainants now move to strike the answer on the ground that the alleged agreement is unenforceable under those provisions of our statute of frauds, which are known as R.S. 25:1-2 and 5(d). The first of these sections enacts that no interest in real estate shall be surrendered unless by deed or note in writing, and the other, that no action shall be brought upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montuori v. BailenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Tompkins v. TompkinsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871
- Van Syckel v. O'HearnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
- Capone v. RanzulliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Brands v. CassedySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Michalski v. MichalskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Hotchkin v. HotchkinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Delnero v. SerraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.