McClain v. Kissler
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
*889*403Plaintiffs Katie McClain and Jonothan Harrell filed suit against defendants Karen Kissler (both individually and doing business as Karen Kissler, Esquire and a medical marijuana collective called "Alternatives"), alleging defendants failed to pay them for their work growing marijuana as agreed under a contract between them. Although the summons and complaint had been served on defendants, and both before and after being served they actively participated in the case, defendants failed to file an answer or other responsive pleading. And though they claimed they had some basis to challenge…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bauman v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Bou v. Velasquez CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Busch v. T. Bear Investments CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Childs v. Dunn CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Felix v. People of California CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.