Legal Opinion

Huh v. Wang

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2007No. H030905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

In this civil action, the appellant challenges an order denying his motion to set aside a summary judgment. For reasons explained below, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

This litigation grew out of a home remodel. Plaintiff and appellant Joe Huh, doing business as Omega Construction, entered into a contract with defendant and respondent Guanyin J. Wang to remodel respondent’s residence.

After disputes arose, appellant filed this action in December 2004 for breach of contract and to enforce a mechanic’s lien. The complaint names respondent as well as several other individuals.1 All…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. HUH v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Arega v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Beverly Hills Estate, LLC v. Warner CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Bou v. Velasquez CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API