Martin Potts & Associates, Inc. v. Corsair, LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOFFSTADT, J.
-A trial court is required by statute to vacate a default, default judgment, or dismissal that is “in fact” caused by an attorney’s *436“mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect” if the attorney files a sworn affidavit “attesting” to such. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).)1 Must the attorney’s affidavit also disclose the reasons for his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect? We conclude the answer is “no.” Although such a statement of reasons will be helpful, and may sometimes be relevant to prove the causal link between the attorney’s conduct and the default,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Lee v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Minick v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Jackson v. Kaiser Found. Hosps., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Aquino v. Klein CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.