Legal Opinion

Martin Potts & Associates, Inc. v. Corsair, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 2016No. B263198PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOFFSTADT, J.

-A trial court is required by statute to vacate a default, default judgment, or dismissal that is “in fact” caused by an attorney’s *436“mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect” if the attorney files a sworn affidavit “attesting” to such. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).)1 Must the attorney’s affidavit also disclose the reasons for his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect? We conclude the answer is “no.” Although such a statement of reasons will be helpful, and may sometimes be relevant to prove the causal link between the attorney’s conduct and the default,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lee v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Minick v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. McClain v. Kissler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Jackson v. Kaiser Found. Hosps., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Aquino v. Klein CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Bailey v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API