Legal Opinion

Davis v. Singleton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1963No. 242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*151Sharp, J.

For the purpose of testing the sufficiency of the complaint, the demurrer to the original complaint and the demurrer ore terms to the amended complaint admitted the following facts:

C. T. Cherry devised and bequeathed his entire estate to plaintiff ■and defendant in equal shares for life and named defendant his executrix. At the time of his death Cherry was the sole owner of a bank deposit in the amount of $9,280.74 which was carried in the name of C. T. Cherry or Sadie Cherry Singleton, and the funds in this account passed under his will at his death. Following the filing of her…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. King v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  4. State v. . McCanlessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kearns v. PrimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Mullinix v. MabryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Davis v. SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Howard v. Iomaxis, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API