Legal Opinion

Mullinix v. Mabry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 2005No. COA04-1301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

C. Allen Mullinix ("Allen") and Karl Mullinix ("Karl") (collectively "plaintiffs") appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Goldia M. Mabry ("Goldia") and husband Scott Mabry ("Scott") (collectively "defendants"). Plaintiffs present the following issues for our consideration: (1) Whether plaintiffs have standing to sue defendants, and (2) whether plaintiffs' action for constructive fraud is barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the grant of summary judgment as to plaintiffs' claims against defendant Goldia,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Satorre v. New Hanover County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Pharmaresearch Corp. v. MashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HORRY v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. HORRY v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API