State v. . McCanless
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The defendants demur: (1) That the court has no jurisdiction of the person of the defendants or of the subject of the action; (2) the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Defendants contend as to the first ground of demurrer: That plaintiff in its complaint is seeking to attack collaterally a final settlement filed by the administrators of N. B. McCanless, deceased, before the clerk of the Superior Court of Rowan County, and that the clerk alone has exclusive original jurisdiction to correct, modify, surcharge or set aside a final settlement of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Haywood v. HaywoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Way v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Pegram v. . ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Shober v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In Re HegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.