Feden v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 Thomas Feden (Husband) and Patricia A. Feden, his wife, appeal the trial court’s order entering summary judgment and dismissing Husband’s claim under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. The Fedens contend that the court erred in concluding that the report of their expert witness was inadmissible to establish causation of Husband’s injuries. Initially, the witness’s report failed to ascribe general acceptance in the scientific community to the cause of Husband’s injuries the witness had diagnosed. Consequently, the court ordered that the case should…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Merriweather v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- L.B. Foster Co. v. Charles Caracciolo Steel & Metal Yard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Woodard v. ChatterjeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Daddona v. ThindCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Brodowski v. RyaveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.