Legal Opinion

Daddona v. Thind

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 2006PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

In this appeal we review the conduct of a products liability trial. A jury rejected Frank P. Daddona (Daddona) and Catherine M. Daddona’s (collectively, Plaintiffs) claim that a front-end loader manufactured by Kawasaki Construction Machinery Corporation of America (Kawasaki) was defectively designed. Plaintiffs appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County (trial court) that denied their post-trial motion seeking a new trial. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In January 1996, Daddona attempted to remove snow from the parking area of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. David Oddi v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mull v. IckesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In Re Appeal of Penn-Delco School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. YaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Expressway 95 Business Center, LP v. Bucks County Board of AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Hunter v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API