Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Topa

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1977No. 134PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Adam Andrew Topa, was tried before a jury and convicted of murder in the first degree. From his conviction he filed a motion fór new trial delineating fifteen reasons in support thereof. The court en banc denied appellant’s motion. On this appeal, appellant urges us to reexamine six issues which he believes warrant reversal and command a new trial. Five of these arguments relate to the use made by the Commonwealth of a tape recording of a telephone call received by the police from an individual who identified himself as “Roger Ferretti” and claimed to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API