Commonwealth v. Topa
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Adam Andrew Topa, was tried before a jury and convicted of murder in the first degree. From his conviction he filed a motion fór new trial delineating fifteen reasons in support thereof. The court en banc denied appellant’s motion. On this appeal, appellant urges us to reexamine six issues which he believes warrant reversal and command a new trial. Five of these arguments relate to the use made by the Commonwealth of a tape recording of a telephone call received by the police from an individual who identified himself as “Roger Ferretti” and claimed to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.