Legal Opinion

Walter v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 5, 1953No. A. R. D. 18; Entry Nos. WH 1603; CE 3186; CE 3187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Olivbe, Chief Judge:

This case is before us as a review of the decision and judgment by Judge Ekwall, D. N. & E. Walter & Co. (Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni) v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 398, Reap. Dec. 7867, sustaining the appraised values of three shipments of rugs exported from China and entered at the port of San Francisco.

In the case of reappraisement 163450-A, appellant (importer) purchased the rugs in China in March 1941. They were shipped from Tientsin, China, in July 1941, and reached Kobe, Japan, where they were to have been transshipped to the United States. Due to war conditions,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Irvine v. RedfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API